Rhizome supports the creation, presentation, and preservation of contemporary art that uses new technologies in significant ways. Read more about us.

searching the art base: would noting subject terms be useful?

Posted by K Staelin on September 3, 2008 5:39 pm

Personally, I like to navigate the art base using the Rhizome/artist terms and I've noticed that there can be a real gap between the terms describing pieces and the piece itself. If there is a discrepancy it is usually the subject term/s that are missing. Although the Rhizome/artist terms include words such as "landscape" and "war," and any term can be added and eventually become a rhizome term, I wonder whether it might be fruitful to seed more subject terms. Alternatively, even preferably, a category devoted to subject terms could be created.

- thoughts?

1 Comment

Comment by Melissa Ann Lambert
September 3, 2008 7:52 pm
I agree - I was frustrated in what I felt to be a limiting description of my art (which it seems is not a good fit for Rhizome, which prefers more interactive and video work than straight digital flat-art).

Not just more descriptive terms, but more accurate words than "war" would be helpful. Also, there is a growing movement of artists combining digital and traditional-media work (I'm one) and there's no description for that.

If we put our heads together we should be able to all brainstorm this so the art translates better to the description.
 

Login

You must login with your Rhizome.org user account to post.

Register here

Posting to Rhizome

Posting to Rhizome has changed, and we no longer support posts by email. If you want to post to Rhizome, please follow the appropriate link below.

Post Formatting Guide

Text Archives

Discussions, reviews, interviews, and announcements posted to Rhizome since 1996, have been archived in our Discuss section. Members may search this valuable, historical resource on new media art with our advanced search tool.