Working on Discuss
-
Hello,
In response to concerns about the Discuss section voiced on and off list, we made a few tweaks to how it works:
[list]
[*]Comments that are new since your last visit are highlighted in red. This should improve the readability of large threads.
[*]There now is an option to "Preview" when replying.[/list]
As always, let us know if you have any questions or find any issues.
Best,
PatrickYou must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
+++
Thanks!
+++You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
+++
1 more thing before you go... it would be great if there was a way to mark all stories as not new.
best,
TimYou must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
Hello,
We've added a link to the discuss section -- Mark all as old. This will remove the "new" flags from all current posts.
Cheers,
PatrickYou must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
Mark all as old. This will remove the "new" flags from all "
wow, thanks, I guess we now have the possibility to use that powerful conceptual tool on both Tom Moody and T. Whid at the same time...
I'm thinking of a new feature related to that
would it be possible whenever anyone clicks on "Mark all as old" that the version number does a +0.1 ?You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
I'm sorry to report that it does not function correctly: Tom Moody and Whid can't be marked "all as old", they always reappear and probably think they are adding something new to their discussions
what's to be done ?You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
+++
hahaYou must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
sorry to report that the "mark all as old" doesn't function for me
I read this board from 2 different PCs, I clicked "mark all as old" on one and that did wipe away all the red new tags
when I looked on the other PC some of them had reappeared
now that I'm back on the PC where I marked all as old they are still there...You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
Patrick --
The nesting limit is defeating the purpose of the format. In complex arguments with multiple parts that multiple people are responding to and remixing in different ways, if we can't reply past the fifth degree, then we're actually better served by the plain old email format, where we could be clear about the particular rhizomatic outgrowth of discussion we're getting in on.
-- VijayYou must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
Hi there,
Can someone please tell me the link to a call for "political art writing", or something similar like this?
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
Mine is not simply a linguistic concern since Freud had used the term “Ich” to refer at times to the self in its totality and at others to an agency or a part of that self.
http://tr.im/15jt ∨ http://classics.mit.edu/Sophocles/antigone.html
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
Can you please block Joan Collins and his/her spam which is ruining the list-it all goes into my junk folder at present!You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In
-
I completely agree with this suggestion
It is rather annoying and stops me from reading this list.
AAYou must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
What's worse: tedium or police?
VijayYou must be logged in to post a comment. Log In -
Joan Colins", like Sting, is both tedium and police.
This is the gentrification of discuss.You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In
Your Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Log In
I'm putting into place a few improvements / adjustments to the Discuss section, with the goal of making extra-long threads more easy to follow. I will be in touch with a full report once these changes are completed, probably tomorrow.
Cheers,
Patrick