Re: Fwd: DOW 'HELP' FOR BHOPAL A HOAX

Hasn't this one been making the rounds for years?
There are Urban Legends sites devoted to tracking tbis
sort of thing.

Out of curiosity how many victims were in need of
compensation and say it were $1000.00 per person
how much would it cost for some entity to quietly
pay people off the way they do in rich countries
under threat of lawsuits?


Have Fun,
Sends Steve

P.S. It is occassionally fired up and passed around to
arouse moral outrage.


> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Dow Chemical Corporation <[email protected]>
>> Date: December 3, 2004 9:18:25 AM PST
>> To: "grifray-yahoo.com" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: DOW "HELP" FOR BHOPAL A HOAX
>>
>> December 3, 2004
>> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>>
>> "DOW" STATEMENT A HOAX
>> "Historic aid package for Bhopal victims" a lie
>>
>> Contact: Marina Ashanin, Corp. Media Relations, +41-1-728-2347
>> Related information: http://dowethics.com/bhopal/
>>
>> Today on BBC World Television, a fake Dow spokesperson announced fake
>> plans to take full responsibility for the very real Bhopal tragedy of
>> December 3, 1984. (1) Dow Chemical emphatically denies this
>> announcement. Although seemingly humanistic in nature, the fake plans
>> were invented by irresponsible hucksters with no regard for the
>> truth.
>>
>> As Dow has repeatedly noted, Dow cannot and will not take
>> responsibility for the accident. ("What we cannot and will not do…
>> is accept responsibility for the Bhopal accident." - CEO Michael
>> Parker, 2002.) The Dow position has not changed, despite public
>> pressure.
>>
>> Dow also notes the great injustice that these pranksters have caused
>> by giving Bhopalis false hope for a better future assisted by Dow.
>> The survivors of Bhopal have already suffered 20 years of false hope,
>> neglect, and abdication of responsibility by all parties. Is that not
>> enough?
>>
>> To be perfectly clear:
>>
>> * The Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) will NOT be liquidated. (The
>> fake "Dow plan" called for the dissolution and sale of Dow's fully
>> owned subsidiary, estimated at US$12 billion, to fund compensation
>> and remediation in Bhopal.)
>>
>> * Dow will NOT commit ANY funds to compensate and treat 120,000
>> Bhopal residents who require lifelong care. The Bhopal victims have
>> ALREADY been compensated; many received about US$500 several years
>> ago, which in India can cover a full year of medical care. (2)
>>
>> * Dow will NOT remediate (clean up) the Bhopal plant site. We do
>> understand that UCC abandoned thousands of tons of toxic chemicals on
>> the site, and that these still contaminate the groundwater which area
>> residents drink. Dow estimates that the Indian government's recent
>> proposal to commission a study to consider the possibility of proper
>> remediation at some point in the future is fully sufficient.
>>
>> * Dow does NOT urge the US to extradite former Union Carbide CEO
>> Warren Anderson to India, where he has been wanted for 20 years on
>> multiple homicide charges. (3)
>>
>> * Dow will NOT release proprietary information on the leaked gases,
>> nor the results of studies commissioned by UCC and never released.
>>
>> * Dow will NOT fund research on the safety of Dow endocrine
>> disruptors (ECDs) considered to have long-term negative effects.
>>
>> * Dow DOES agree that "One can't assign a dollar value to doing
>> what's morally right," as hoaxter Finisterra said. That is why Dow
>> acknowledged and resolved many of Union Carbide's liabilities in the
>> US immediately after acquiring the company in 2001. (4)
>>
>> Again, most importantly of all:
>>
>> * Dow shareholders will see NO losses, because Dow's policy towards
>> Bhopal HAS NOT CHANGED. Much as we at Dow may care, as human beings,
>> about the victims of the Bhopal catastrophe, we must reiterate that
>> Dow's sole and unique responsibility is to its shareholders, and Dow
>> CANNOT do anything that goes against its bottom line unless forced to
>> by law.
>>
>> For more information please contact Marina Ashanin, Corporate Media
>> Relations, +41-1-728-2347, or reply to this email.
>>
>>
>> NOTES TO EDITORS:
>>
>> (1) On December 3, 1984, Union Carbide - now part of Dow -
>> accidentally killed thousands of residents of Bhopal, India, when its
>> pesticide plant leaked a vast cloud of lethal gas over the city.
>> Since that date, at least 12,000 more people have died from
>> complications, and 120,000 remain chronically ill. The Dow Chemical
>> Corporation hereby expresses its condolences to the victims.
>>
>> (2) Union Carbide was originally forced to pay US$470 million in
>> compensation to survivors, which amounts to about US$500 per victim.
>> (Note: Dow hereby wishes to retract the 2002 statement of Dow PR Head
>> Kathy Hunt as to US$500 being "plenty good for an Indian." The poor
>> phrasing of this statement has often come back to haunt us.)
>>
>> (3) Arrested in India following the accident, Andersen posted
>> US$2000 bail and successfully escaped India.
>>
>> (4) Dow settled Union Carbide's asbestos liabilities in the US, and
>> paid US$10 million to one family poisoned by a Dow pesticide. This
>> is a mark of Dow's corporate responsibility.
>>
>> # 30 #
>>
>>
>
> +
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

Comments

, ryan griffis

Not sure what you're referring to as a hoax, steve.
The Bhopal disaster is a reality, so i'm sure you don't mean to imply
that that part is a hoax.
There are two hoaxes at work here (perpetrated by the same party),
neither of which would ever qualify as an urban legend, simply because
they are purposefully exposed well before they could become a "legend."
The first hoax was the Yes Men impersonation of a Dow representative in
a BBC interview. The second hoax is the impersonation of Dow in the
form of the retraction letter recognizing the first impersonation, also
by the YM.
All the stats on people effected by the Union Carbide accident are
available, as is the amount of money (not) spent by UC or Dow in clean
up and medical costs.
Sadly, moral outrage seems to be passe, unless it's about taxes and sex.
ryan

On Dec 3, 2004, at 4:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:

>
> Hasn't this one been making the rounds for years?
> There are Urban Legends sites devoted to tracking tbis
> sort of thing.
>
> Out of curiosity how many victims were in need of
> compensation and say it were $1000.00 per person
> how much would it cost for some entity to quietly
> pay people off the way they do in rich countries
> under threat of lawsuits?
>
>
> Have Fun,
> Sends Steve
>
> P.S. It is occassionally fired up and passed around to
> arouse moral outrage.
>