[Fwd: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: Re: Curt Cloninger]

I personally have finally been getting something usefull out of this list. Not that it is much in the way of progress, but it has at least got a number of people to come together about something. And that is more than i have experienced from this list since joining.

As for your plea for more madness? show me madness and i will much happier. Get this many people together to talk about madness, and we all will be extatic. Madness is ok. I just havent seen any madness worth talking about.



-me



Eric Dymond wrote:

>please see:
>
>http://www.well.com/user/jmalloy/flamewar/
>
>you know, there is a place for serious discussion, and then there are listservs.
>They can be lively, and hopefully outrageous.
>This has become far to pedantic.
>Lighten up, and act like madness was ok here.
>smile
>(Curts a fine person, I'm sure, and quite capable of resonding with an appropriate response.)
>
>It is sad that casual conversation has become the standard on the list.
>Eric
>
>Michael Szpakowski wrote:
>
>
>
>>Oh Dear!
>>The idea that someone whose rhetorical heights reach
>>cheap innuendo of a McCarthyite bent should be taken
>>seriously for even an instant as a critic of Curt
>>Cloninger , who has contributed so much and so clearly
>>to this list, would be laughable if it wasn't that in
>>these fevered times that mud can stick.
>>
>>On the few occasions that Curt has ventured a
>>political opinion it hasn't been mine.
>>On art he is matchless, even when one disagrees with
>>him.
>>What stands out about him is both his fearlessness and
>>his honesty.
>>The idea firstly that Bush et al require a provocateur
>>on the list is bizarre paranoia but the idea that they
>>would recruit the one person who is completely open
>>about his differences with what I think he would call
>>the "liberal consensus" is totally risible.
>>Please do crawl back into your hole, Mr Dymond, & stay
>>there - to date your posts have been both deeply
>>sleazy & ( in the old Yorkshire phraseology) *neither
>>use nor ornament*.
>>michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>— Eric Dymond <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>a simple question,
>>>Curt…., where do you get your funding?
>>>+
>>>-> post: [email protected]
>>>-> questions: [email protected]
>>>-> subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>>>-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>>>-> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is
>>>open to non-members
>>>+
>>>Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set
>>>out in the
>>>Membership Agreement available online at
>>>http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
>>http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>>
>>
>+
>-> post: [email protected]
>-> questions: [email protected]
>-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>-> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
>+
>Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
>