I think its just a practical point -the list format
can be confusing enough as it is.
The lack of names makes it difficult to see exactly
how an argument is being developed- you can't see the
flow of argumant and counter-argument or not at least
without considerable forensic efforts.
Personally , although I'm pretty patient and
tenacious, this tends to make me lose interest in what
perhaps could be an interesting exercise.
I suspect I'm not alone in this - there doesn't seems
to have been the cross pollination that one might have
hoped for between the two lists.
--- Eryk Salvaggio <firstname.lastname@example.org
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "yasir" <email@example.com
> > The senders name is not appearing when the DC-3
> message comes thru Raw,
> > as you might have noticed. You can't tell who's
> saying what. Can this be
> > remedied? Thx.
> Otherwise we may be forced to read and agree with
> people we never read and
> but know we don't agree with.
> -> post: firstname.lastname@example.org
> -> questions: email@example.com
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org
web site is
> open to non-members
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set
> out in the
> Membership Agreement available online athttp://rhizome.org/info/29.php
*** QuickTime large QuickTime NUMBER, it is small, office being nearly office OF the office OF the COMMANDS office OF the film or many nearly time the small order where that, that is the office OF the office OF the COMMANDS QuickTime when into the film, is given, it gives the office OF thehttp://www.somedancersandmusicians.com/Some_QuickTime_Movieshttp://www.somedancersandmusicians.com/
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it nowhttp://companion.yahoo.com/