Re: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,

Posted by Doug Lewis | Tue Sep 24th 2002 1 a.m.

hey Steve,

i suppose that an answer could be something like... regardless of choice
of mediums, artists artmakings most often come from the same origins or
core (hahaha ha).... So i suppose that the medium and its various
crosswired messages are all water consumed from the same well. If there
echolli in the wellspring and the thirst is running rampant - better start
pumping out the "Rare" vaccinations - but of course that slippery slope is
for another other e-day.

With a pound of luck, new media and its users will evolve into one big
happy biotechnicized (All in the) family - but this is definitely not Star
Trek; there are multiple species out there with really pissy attitudes.

i do like your phrase "wired contingent"... i feel like i should go plug in
something else!

cheers, d

From:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
Sent:Monday, September 23, 2002 5:35 PM
To:dlewis@wag.mb.ca
Cc:list@rhizome.org
Subject:RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not SO sorry

Doug

the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?

regards
steve

>speaking as a Canadian (though i try not to be so regionalist) - i
>concur... personally i blame Hollywood.
>
> regards, d
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:sbrockbank [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
> Sent:Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:46 PM
> To:arc .- -. --. . .-..
> Cc:list@rhizome.org
> Subject:Re: RHIZOME_RAW: sorry
>
> Rhizome
>
>sorry - i just discovered you all seem to be addicted to insulting each
>other over a safe distence... it hadn't occured to me that this was
>going to be the normal approach of the list... is this a reflection of
>the normalised aggression of the US citizen?
>
>s
>
>
>
> + une dans la gueule, and two for tea !
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

+ http://rhizome.org/cgi/slogan.cgi
-> post: list@rhizome.org
-> questions: info@rhizome.org
-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
+
Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
  • D42 Kandinskij | Tue Sep 24th 2002 1 a.m.
    > From:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]

    > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
    > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
    > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
    > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    >
    > regards
    > steve

    I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
    stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?

    THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!

    Love.

    Ditz.
  • D42 Kandinskij | Tue Sep 24th 2002 1 a.m.
    Also, I really want to know:

    when will ALL AMERICANS stop eating red caviar for breakfast?

    The questionis driving me nuts,
    and I shant sleep until there isa resolution.

    This isa HOLY WAR I tell you.

    And Im going to have Eryk salvaggio ias my general.
  • Ana Valdes | Wed Sep 25th 2002 1 a.m.
    If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care. Why
    discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up people and
    insult each other privately, please.
    Ana

    "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:

    > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    >
    > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
    > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
    > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
    > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > >
    > > regards
    > > steve
    >
    > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
    > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    >
    > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    >
    > Love.
    >
    > Ditz.
    >

    "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:

    > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    >
    > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
    > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
    > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
    > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > >
    > > regards
    > > steve
    >
    > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
    > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    >
    > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    >
    > Love.
    >
    > Ditz.
    >
    > + the assholes playground
    > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > +
    > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
  • D42 Kandinskij | Wed Sep 25th 2002 1 a.m.
    On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:

    > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.

    And the world revolves around you, and what you care and don't care
    about. I forgot, Mme, sorry,

    > Why discharge

    I am not 'discraging' anything.

    > in a public list all these childish invectives?

    These are not childish invectives.

    > Grow up people

    Start with yourself.

    > insult each other privately, please.

    That's nice dear. Why don't you take your own advice,
    and not send this e-mail which reeks of self-important
    conceit?

    I certainly am not insulting anyone,
    so spare me your half-witted judgement.
  • clement Thomas | Wed Sep 25th 2002 1 a.m.
    dear Ana,

    of course it would be more simple to kill the egg in the hen, or to never
    let the magic bean grow up to the sky.
    but, who would find the golden treasure then ?
    Believe me, if cash flow follows trash flows, thus pavu.com's plining
    technology will assure you the best value in upgrade.
    Flame floods and spams are the natural catastrophes of the mailing lists,
    and you can't hide from an stormquaker by reading THE hazebook with
    sunglasses.

    of course, if Wonder Woman is not the solution you expected to get ride of
    these stallonic stickists, i may suggest soft therapy.

    you believe in sychotherapy but don't trust the doctor ?
    Sing the trashmails and make new friends for free.
    http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/index.html
    -/ don't trash your trash mails, sing it ! /-
    btw,
    "Grow up people and insult each other privately, please."
    is a very good title for a flame song.

    with all my love,

    OG

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "ana l. valdes" <agora@algonet.se>
    To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
    Cc: "Doug Lewis" <dlewis@wag.mb.ca>; <sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk>;
    <list@rhizome.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:36 AM
    Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,

    >
    > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.
    Why
    > discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up people
    and
    > insult each other privately, please.
    > Ana
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
    >
    > > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    > >
    > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
    function
    > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
    this
    > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
    the
    > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > > >
    > > > regards
    > > > steve
    > >
    > > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
    > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    > >
    > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    > >
    > > Love.
    > >
    > > Ditz.
    > >
    >
    > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
    >
    > > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    > >
    > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
    function
    > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
    this
    > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
    the
    > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > > >
    > > > regards
    > > > steve
    > >
    > > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
    > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    > >
    > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    > >
    > > Love.
    > >
    > > Ditz.
    > >
    > > + the assholes playground
    > > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > > +
    > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
    >
    > + the assholes playground
    > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > +
    > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
    >
  • Ana Valdes | Wed Sep 25th 2002 1 a.m.
    It seems all mailinglists and public arenas has the same problem, a few highly
    verbal skilled people use it to exchange invectives and try to state their own
    values and merits, the result is often that the other ones, the people
    interested in exchanges of experiences and knowledge, dissapear and go
    elsewhere. I choose this alternative and guess that you and and the few who
    enjoy the first one are going to be alone in your kindergarden.
    Good luck
    Ana

    "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:

    > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:
    >
    > > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.
    >
    > And the world revolves around you, and what you care and don't care
    > about. I forgot, Mme, sorry,
    >
    > > Why discharge
    >
    > I am not 'discraging' anything.
    >
    > > in a public list all these childish invectives?
    >
    > These are not childish invectives.
    >
    > > Grow up people
    >
    > Start with yourself.
    >
    > > insult each other privately, please.
    >
    > That's nice dear. Why don't you take your own advice,
    > and not send this e-mail which reeks of self-important
    > conceit?
    >
    > I certainly am not insulting anyone,
    > so spare me your half-witted judgement.
    >
    > + the assholes playground
    > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > +
    > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
  • marc garrett | Wed Sep 25th 2002 1 a.m.
    Ace!

    Thanx Clement - brilliant. Love it...especially 'Dog Mama'.

    marc

    > dear Ana,
    >
    > of course it would be more simple to kill the egg in the hen, or to never
    > let the magic bean grow up to the sky.
    > but, who would find the golden treasure then ?
    > Believe me, if cash flow follows trash flows, thus pavu.com's plining
    > technology will assure you the best value in upgrade.
    > Flame floods and spams are the natural catastrophes of the mailing lists,
    > and you can't hide from an stormquaker by reading THE hazebook with
    > sunglasses.
    >
    > of course, if Wonder Woman is not the solution you expected to get ride of
    > these stallonic stickists, i may suggest soft therapy.
    >
    > you believe in sychotherapy but don't trust the doctor ?
    > Sing the trashmails and make new friends for free.
    > http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/index.html
    > -/ don't trash your trash mails, sing it ! /-
    > btw,
    > "Grow up people and insult each other privately, please."
    > is a very good title for a flame song.
    >
    > with all my love,
    >
    > OG
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "ana l. valdes" <agora@algonet.se>
    > To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
    > Cc: "Doug Lewis" <dlewis@wag.mb.ca>; <sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk>;
    > <list@rhizome.org>
    > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:36 AM
    > Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,
    >
    >
    > >
    > > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.
    > Why
    > > discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up people
    > and
    > > insult each other privately, please.
    > > Ana
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
    > >
    > > > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    > > >
    > > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
    > function
    > > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
    > this
    > > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
    > the
    > > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > > > >
    > > > > regards
    > > > > steve
    > > >
    > > > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > > > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudule=
    nt
    > > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > > > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    > > >
    > > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    > > >
    > > > Love.
    > > >
    > > > Ditz.
    > > >
    > >
    > > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
    > >
    > > > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    > > >
    > > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
    > function
    > > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
    > this
    > > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
    > the
    > > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > > > >
    > > > > regards
    > > > > steve
    > > >
    > > > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > > > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudule=
    nt
    > > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > > > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    > > >
    > > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    > > >
    > > > Love.
    > > >
    > > > Ditz.
    > > >
    > > > + the assholes playground
    > > > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > > > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rh=
    iz
    > > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > > > +
    > > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.p=
    hp
    > >
    > > + the assholes playground
    > > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > > +
    > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
    > >
    >
    > + the assholes playground
    > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > +
    > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
    >
  • D42 Kandinskij | Wed Sep 25th 2002 1 a.m.
    On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:

    > It seems all mailinglists and public arenas has the same problem, a few highly
    > verbal skilled people use it to exchange invectives

    Nobody is 'exchanging invectives'.

    > and try to state their own values and merits,

    Nor is anyone involved in stating values in merits.

    > the result is often that the other ones, the people
    > interested in exchanges of experiences and knowledge, dissapear and go
    > elsewhere.

    Chuckle. One cannot 'exchange' experience and knowledge.
    As for the rest; the righteous will indignantly walk away?

    > I choose this alternative

    Right. Yet another attempt to stomp your little foot--
    nacked up by a whole crowd of followers, those 'interested
    in exchanges of nonsense,' n'est pas?

    The petulant princess pose, is by far the favorite it seems.

    > and guess that you and and the few who
    > enjoy the first one are going to be alone in your kindergarden.

    Right. wants to throw insults, and cleanly walk off.
    The prima-donna.

    The only one in kindergarten here is you, dearest.

    As for being alone--everyone is.
    Don't attempt to raise that 'if you don't behave, the mob
    will leave you' trick.

    That has never been the case + you are attempting
    'righteous' ostracizing.

    > Good luck

    Insincerity does not suit you, dear.
  • clement Thomas | Thu Sep 26th 2002 1 a.m.
    dear Ana,

    so sorry that you leave rhizome list in autumn,
    You know there are few leaves to fall now, soon the white winter calm will
    be back.

    anyway, what i wanted to say is that you have a mirror woman friend here in
    France, called Aliette, and she also writes songs like you do, where she
    says " I don't quit the list..."
    listen,
    http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/songs/AG004.mp3

    I'm glad and lucky too, and I want to thank you for your song.
    soon online.

    wishing you the best always,

    --
    OG
    http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/
    the Flame Songs

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "ana l. valdes" <agora@algonet.se>
    To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
    Cc: "Doug Lewis" <dlewis@wag.mb.ca>; <sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk>;
    <list@rhizome.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:54 PM
    Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,

    > It seems all mailinglists and public arenas has the same problem, a few
    highly
    > verbal skilled people use it to exchange invectives and try to state their
    own
    > values and merits, the result is often that the other ones, the people
    > interested in exchanges of experiences and knowledge, dissapear and go
    > elsewhere. I choose this alternative and guess that you and and the few
    who
    > enjoy the first one are going to be alone in your kindergarden.
    > Good luck
    > Ana
    >
    > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
    >
    > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:
    > >
    > > > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't
    care.
    > >
    > > And the world revolves around you, and what you care and don't care
    > > about. I forgot, Mme, sorry,
    > >
    > > > Why discharge
    > >
    > > I am not 'discraging' anything.
    > >
    > > > in a public list all these childish invectives?
    > >
    > > These are not childish invectives.
    > >
    > > > Grow up people
    > >
    > > Start with yourself.
    > >
    > > > insult each other privately, please.
    > >
    > > That's nice dear. Why don't you take your own advice,
    > > and not send this e-mail which reeks of self-important
    > > conceit?
    > >
    > > I certainly am not insulting anyone,
    > > so spare me your half-witted judgement.
    > >
    > > + the assholes playground
    > > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > > +
    > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
    >
    > + Barbarians at the XOR-gate
    > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > +
    > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
    >
  • clement Thomas | Thu Sep 26th 2002 1 a.m.
    my pleasure, marc

    Dog Mama is to enter the top ten.

    best

    --
    OG
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: furtherfield
    To: clement Thomas ; list@rhizome.com
    Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:27 AM
    Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,

    Ace!

    Thanx Clement - brilliant. Love it...especially 'Dog Mama'.

    marc

    > dear Ana,
    >
    > of course it would be more simple to kill the egg in the hen, or to nev=
    er
    > let the magic bean grow up to the sky.
    > but, who would find the golden treasure then ?
    > Believe me, if cash flow follows trash flows, thus pavu.com's plining
    > technology will assure you the best value in upgrade.
    > Flame floods and spams are the natural catastrophes of the mailing list=
    s,
    > and you can't hide from an stormquaker by reading THE hazebook with
    > sunglasses.
    >
    > of course, if Wonder Woman is not the solution you expected to get ride=
    of
    > these stallonic stickists, i may suggest soft therapy.
    >
    > you believe in sychotherapy but don't trust the doctor ?
    > Sing the trashmails and make new friends for free.
    > http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/index.html
    > -/ don't trash your trash mails, sing it ! /-
    > btw,
    > "Grow up people and insult each other privately, please."
    > is a very good title for a flame song.
    >
    > with all my love,
    >
    > OG
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "ana l. valdes" <agora@algonet.se>
    > To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
    > Cc: "Doug Lewis" <dlewis@wag.mb.ca>; <sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk>;
    > <list@rhizome.org>
    > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:36 AM
    > Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,
    >
    >
    > >
    > > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't ca=
    re.
    > Why
    > > discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up peo=
    ple
    > and
    > > insult each other privately, please.
    > > Ana
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
    > >
    > > > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    > > >
    > > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
    > function
    > > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not
    Is
    > this
    > > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood a=
    nd
    > the
    > > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > > > >
    > > > > regards
    > > > > steve
    > > >
    > > > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > > > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudu=
    lent
    > > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > > > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    > > >
    > > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    > > >
    > > > Love.
    > > >
    > > > Ditz.
    > > >
    > >
    > > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
    > >
    > > > > From: sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk [SMTP:sbrockbank@krokodile.co.uk]
    > > >
    > > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
    > function
    > > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not
    Is
    > this
    > > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood a=
    nd
    > the
    > > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
    > > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
    > > > >
    > > > > regards
    > > > > steve
    > > >
    > > > I'll give you one very easy answer--they don't.
    > > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
    > > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
    > > > figured out'--and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudu=
    lent
    > > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
    > > > continue to pose--but why dont they stop acting that way?
    > > >
    > > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
    > > >
    > > > Love.
    > > >
    > > > Ditz.
    > > >
    > > > + the assholes playground
    > > > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > > > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.=
    rhiz
    > > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > > > +
    > > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29=
    .php
    > >
    > > + the assholes playground
    > > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rh=
    iz
    > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > > +
    > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.p=
    hp
    > >
    >
    > + the assholes playground
    > -> post: list@rhizome.org
    > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
    > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
    > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
    > +
    > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
    > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
    >
Your Reply