On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Pall Thayer wrote:
> Quotes have quotation marks and a reference to the source.
No, they don't. This is not high-school.
> Anything else is plagiarism
No, Palle. Not 'anything else is plagiarism'.
> as well as an infringement on copyright law.
Nep. Besides copyright law differs from country to country.
> Do you really think that everyone on this list just happened to know
> that your text belonged to someone else?
Anyone with two ounces of intelligence, yes.
This was an 'authoritiative' text on gnosticism.
Just like when Eryk quote Tao Te Ching, he didn't use 'quotation
marks and a reference'.
You're a pathetic moron, who simply watches things he doesn't get
and woo-ha--let's jump into the fray. Get your murderous impulses
> You started a new thread with it. Then how are people supposed to "know" that it had something to do
> with a post from Eryk.
Easy--you pay attention. This is a mailing list, not a school paper.
Get over yourself.
> If you really believe
Flippant use of the word believe.
> that plagiarist.org
> place to learn what plagiarism means then you're even more confused than
> you appear to be.
Right. That's why I sent you to plagiarist.org
For educational purposes.
Let's see: so far you've made up an inappropriate comment on
proper usage, flamed me fora typo, and now you're proceeding
to inappropriate accusations of plagiarism.
After that, you MAKE UP that I sent you to plagiasrist.org
for EDUCTATIONAL purposes, and righteously proceed to call me
> I'm filtering you out from now on.
Pathetic childish behavior #67787678.
Don't worry dear Palle, you have your mini-publicity you're so starved
for, have picked on the right person, and joined in the common gesture.
Btw--why don't you write to the Gnostic Bishop and tell him how
concerned you area bout his being plagiarized?
Such a righteous boy.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42